NARCISSISM OF GAY INCLUSIVE THEOLOGY

Against the Christian doctrine that there is no inspiration any more since the last apostle died and so there are to be no new doctrines we are expected today to pretend that the Bible can be interpreted in an affirming way for LGBT. 

Deuteronomy 23:17: "There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel."

It is very narcissistic or deceptive of todays gays to pretend that the Bible DOES NOT want them stoned.  They engage in far-fetched distortion of how Leviticus and Paul's epistle to the Romans both endorse the death of people for engaging in gay sex.

Even if those texts only meant abusive forms of gay sex and not loving relationships why was the penalty so severe?  They were stoned to death and God said he commanded this fate.

Here are the crimes demanding execution by divine command.  The execution was typically performed by stoning.  A naughty daughter of a priest was however burned to death.

 

When you read the execution list you wonder how gays could think they would get an exemption!

 

Murder (Exodus 21:12-14; Leviticus 24:17,21)
Attacking or cursing a parent (Exodus 21:15,17)
Kidnapping (Exodus 21:16)
Failure to confine a dangerous animal, resulting in death (Exodus 21:28-29)
Witchcraft and sorcery (Exodus 22:18, Leviticus 20:27, Deuteronomy 13:5, 1 Samuel 28:9)
Sex with an animal (Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 20:16)
Doing work on the Sabbath (Exodus 31:14, 35:2, Numbers 15:32-36)
Incest (Leviticus 18:6-18, 20:11-12,14,17,19-21)
Adultery (Leviticus 20:10; Deuteronomy 22:22)
Homosexual acts (Leviticus 20:13)
Prostitution by a priest's daughter (Leviticus 21:9)
Blasphemy (Leviticus 24:14,16, 23)
False prophecy (Deuteronomy 18:20)
Perjury in capital cases (Deuteronomy 19:16-19)
False claim of a woman's virginity at time of marriage (Deuteronomy 22:13-21)

Sex between a woman pledged to be married and a man other than her betrothed (Deuteronomy 22:23-24)

 

Many protest against the notion that if you are gay or homosexual or lesbian then this is your identity and part of you as a person. They say that is absurd and leads to further absurdities. They say you should argue that if a man is a paedophile and born that way then you should say pedophilia is a part of who he is.  They clearly then see gays and lesbians as enabling paedophiles in the craftiest way and making them feel they are paedophiles in principle.  It is interesting that Catholics see baptism as making you a Catholic as a person for it changes your being but what are you if you are not baptised?  You must be sub-human or just a human being!  The believers can talk about absurd consequences!

The argument that gays are gay as people seems to be based on the idea that it is not a choice. But what if it is? Then it would be true that you were born with the ability to become gay. So in that sense you could say that whether chosen or not it is still what you are for it has something to do with how you are born.

The Christians say that LGBT assume that the sex of your body has nothing to do with a gay or lesbian identity. So a woman’s body that is unable to have sexual intercourse with another woman does not mean her identity is that she should seek sex with a man. What she is has nothing to do with the “language” of her body "design". Sexuality and the body are separate issues. It does not matter how you use your body sexually – a gay man can ignore the fact that a rectum does not seem to be for holding a penis. The argument if correct shows why LGB consider transgender people to be one part of the umbrella. That is why we have LGBT.

It seems degrading to argue that the body does not matter only what we want to do with it. It seems to be like you are using your body like a thing instead of realising that your body is you.  But the fact remains that this logic is accepted by nobody for who believes that a husband and wife should do nothing sexual only intercourse?  Sexuality is more varied than that!

 

LGBT should be just affirmed.  The Bible should not matter.  LGBT with Bibles are just offensive.